OK. Bowling for Columbine, My reaction.
Anyway, apparently trashing the media which could
very well be a factor in the 'FUD' campaign of violence & reasons to be
afraid, he continues on his tirade against firearms which is easier to make
people hate I believe.
OK so I just spent (or maybe wasted) two hours
watching Bowling for Columbine by the autistic
child.Now, I need to preface
this little mini-review of mine with that I'm not a big fan of guns. I don't
think they should be outlawed or anything extreme like that. I do think that
maybe some of the existing laws should be enforced - strongly - and things could
be better there. I personally have no desire to own a weapon, and I've only
fired a .22 caliber rifle about 20 times one day when I shot up a TV outside my
Dad's barn while they were out of town at the age of 16 - 18 I think. Not sure
exactly what year but I had a TV in the trunk of the car that belonged to a
friend of mine, and he slept with a girl I was dating so I blew away the TV. I
may have been emulating the video my friends did that I mentioned in a previous
blog where they blew away a TV. It seemed rather entertaining and I thought I'd
try it.I'd also like to mention that
most video games with a light gun highly appeal to me, I enjoy it and usually
get pretty far in the game. I've often thought about buying a gun but Angi has
stopped me numerous times because she is very against having a firearm of any
kind. So we never got one.Anyway,
back to my thoughts on the autistic child and his Bowling for Columbine
movie. What drove me nuts about it was just as I was starting to get
interested in what he'd have to say he'd do some type of tangent rant that would
ruin what he'd just done.I mean one
part I liked his how he went to Canada and interviewed people about their
attitudes on guns. He showed how homes were unlocked (which was rather funny,
he'd just walk to the house and opened a door to see if they were unlocked).
Anyway I digress. He talked with people, most of them had guns. Some even
(gasp) had 6 - 12 each. What he started to draw as a parallel was that the
news media in Canada doesn't have one of my most hated things about the US
Media. US media spends every episode 'scaring' you about something. While
the Canadian media (what he showed) was less on 'flash' and more on
substance.What was also interesting to
me was the parallel he drew on how wells spoken the politicians were compared to
some of ours. That was rather amusing but easily forged because you could
always find a well spoken guy and a blithering
idiot.Anyway, apparently
trashing the media which could very well be a factor in the 'FUD' campaign of
violence & reasons to be afraid, he continues on his tirade against firearms
which is easier to make people hate I
believe.One of the more interesting
things was that he took two of the kids shot up at Columbine to K-Mart
headquarters. Apparently K-Mart sold the bullets. However K-Mart doesn't sell
handguns so the sold the bullets instead. They went to ask K-Mart to stop
selling handgun bullets. Faced with an army of cameras the second day (from
media hounds) they said they were going to remove all handgun bullets within 90
days. Coincidence? Who knows. It'd been nice if
they followed up in a few months later and seen if they were actually gone, but
they didn't.Also the highlight of the
show was to show up at Charlton Heston's home and interview him a bit.
Apparently after a few high profile showings the NRA showed up within a week to
declare that hand guns are wonderful and all. Entirely in bad taste in my
opinion. One of them had a six year old shoot a six year old type of thing, and
they were there in 48 hours. Heston claimed he didn't know about that one, and
walked off when he was asked then why show up at the worst school massacre with
Columbine. The autistic child had some good points and Heston
had no good answers. I've not been a fan of the NRA and some of the things they
were done but would have thought their 'president' could have come up with some
answers to his questions.Overall I'm
not sure what I think. This leaned to some of my liberal sides, but also
really irritated my centrist nature. He pushed a lot of buttons with agendas
but also managed to sneak in a good idea here or there. I'm tempted to check
out F911 as I've been from the start, but I think I'll wait for it to show up on
Showtime or whatever it comes too. It's not like it'll change my opinion about
our current appointed (er, sorry, ELECTED) leaders.
Posted: Fri - July 9, 2004 at 11:57 PM
 
|